1. Hello,


    New users on the forum won't be able to send PM untill certain criteria are met (you need to have at least 6 posts in any sub forum).

    One more important message - Do not answer to people pretending to be from xnxx team or a member of the staff. If the email is not from forum@xnxx.com or the message on the forum is not from StanleyOG it's not an admin or member of the staff. Please be carefull who you give your information to.


    Best regards,

    StanleyOG.

    Dismiss Notice
  2. Hello,


    You can now get verified on forum.

    The way it's gonna work is that you can send me a PM with a verification picture. The picture has to contain you and forum name on piece of paper or on your body and your username or my username instead of the website name, if you prefer that.

    I need to be able to recognize you in that picture. You need to have some pictures of your self in your gallery so I can compare that picture.

    Please note that verification is completely optional and it won't give you any extra features or access. You will have a check mark (as I have now, if you want to look) and verification will only mean that you are who you say you are.

    You may not use a fake pictures for verification. If you try to verify your account with a fake picture or someone else picture, or just spam me with fake pictures, you will get Banned!

    The pictures that you will send me for verification won't be public


    Best regards,

    StanleyOG.

    Dismiss Notice
  1. CS natureboy

    CS natureboy Porn Star

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2011
    Messages:
    27,286
    Fake news, leftwing fear and propaganda... Tell me Stumbler, who has been arrested and where are these raids taking place?

    This is just another one of your fantasies playing out in your head...:wacky:
     
    #61
  2. stumbler

    stumbler Porn Star

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2006
    Messages:
    106,324
    “This is going to create chaos in the dozens of states whose voters have chosen to regulate medical and adult use marijuana rather than leaving it in the hands of criminals,” Neill Franklin, executive director of the pro-legalization Law Enforcement Action Partnership, said in a statement. “If enforcement of laws are subject to the whims of individual prosecutors, no one will have any idea what is legal or what isn’t — because it could change from day to day.”
     
    #63
  3. CS natureboy

    CS natureboy Porn Star

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2011
    Messages:
    27,286
    FYI Stumbler, life changes from day to day....

    Also if you didn't want this marijuana quagmire, then why didn't the Democrats change the laws when they could have easily done it?

    Just like on taxes and everything else, the Democrats have people like you brainwashed and unable to think and reason on your own. You have to be told what to believe by your Democrat dictators....

    People like you spend their lives straddling the poverty line while praising, worshiping and re-electing the people that put and keep you there.....
     
    #64
  4. stumbler

    stumbler Porn Star

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2006
    Messages:
    106,324
    It is truly comical the way you can only live in the past instead of being able to face the reality that under President Obama both medical marijuana and recreational marijuana was protected while now Trump and Sessions are starting another war on legal pot.

    I would really hate to go through life as child like as you are.
     
    #65
  5. shootersa

    shootersa Frisky Feline

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2010
    Messages:
    86,013
    You people just can't see what Trump/Sessions are really up to, can you?
    Spew on
     
    #66
  6. CS natureboy

    CS natureboy Porn Star

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2011
    Messages:
    27,286
    Funny you didn't have any faith in Obama's position on marijuana while he was in office for 8 years. As I remember, you said Obama probably wouldn't sign a bill legalizing it even if Congress pass legislation and sent a bill to his desk.

    Then you called Obama a racial slur....:hilarious:

    I would hate to go through life poor and stupid as you are...:p
     
    #67
  7. steve_vme

    steve_vme The truth seeker

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2008
    Messages:
    2,164
    So you know nothing about the charters of freedom. Our rights were established in the Declaration of Independence, all you have to do is understand the first couple of paragraphs.
     
    #68
  8. deleted user 777 698

    deleted user 777 698 Porn Star Banned!

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2015
    Messages:
    8,747
    I'm sorry to disagree with you pot heads but marijuana is not good for anything but possibly medicinal purposes. I want to see all you folks live to be 100 and be physically fit and mentally strong until your last breath. Breathing in toxic fumes of anything is not conducive to your good health.
     
    1. conroe4
      There's not but two or three of us potheads on here, and you agree with us already. LOL.
      Probably not a good idea to operate a crane 1,000' up while high, but it's pretty harmless
      sitting in front of a TV at night watching Trump eat liberals.
       
      conroe4, Jan 25, 2018
    #71
  9. Rixer

    Rixer Horndog

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2008
    Messages:
    28,938
     
    • Like Like x 1
    1. deleted user 777 698
      Just trying to help you guys. When you are in your eighties and have health problems you'll think of Mr Smith. You'll think Mr Smith was right after all... Hopefully, you guys will make your eighties.
       
      deleted user 777 698, Jan 29, 2018
    2. Rixer
      Thanks for your heartfelt concern. :rolleyes:
       
      Rixer, Jan 29, 2018
    #72
  10. stumbler

    stumbler Porn Star

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2006
    Messages:
    106,324
    Congress members ask Trump administration to back off marijuana

     
    • Like Like x 1
    #73
  11. deleted user 777 698

    deleted user 777 698 Porn Star Banned!

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2015
    Messages:
    8,747
    If you only knew...
     
    #74
  12. Mayling

    Mayling SEX FIEND

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2015
    Messages:
    8,706
    I want to know ......I need to know.
     
    #75
  13. gammaXray

    gammaXray Porn Star

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2013
    Messages:
    2,815
    You must be STONED or something Not to Know Trump & the GOP want to undue hundreds of Regulations that cleaned up our AIR & Water. This is what Trumpism is About !!

    To refresh the president’s memory, back in the 1960s, smog in major U.S. cities was so thick it blocked the sun. Rivers ran brown with raw sewage and toxic chemicals. Cleveland’s Cuyahoga River and at least two other urban waterways were so polluted they caught on fire. Lead-laced paint and gasoline poisoned children, damaging their brains and nervous systems. Cars without seatbelts, air bags or safety glass were unsafe at any speed. And hazardous working conditions killed an average of 14,000 workers annually, nearly three times the number today.

    In response, Congress enacted the Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act, Safe Drinking Water Act and other landmark pieces of legislation to protect public health and safety. Some of those laws also created the Consumer Product Safety Commission, Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), National Highway Traffic Safety Commission, Occupational Safety and Health Administration, and other federal agencies to write and enforce safeguards.

    None of those laws, or the regulations they spawned, existed in 1960.

    Trump Grew Up on Dirty Air

    Trump should remember quite well what it was like in the 1960s. After all, he lived in New York, at the time one of the dirtiest cities in the country. Garbage incinerators routinely rained ash on city streets, while coal- and oil-fired power plants spewed a noxious mix of sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxide and toxic metals. John V. Lindsay, the city’s mayor from 1966 to 1973, famously quipped , “I never trust air I can’t see,” but it was no laughing matter. On Thanksgiving weekend the year Lindsay took office, the smog was so bad it killed some 200 people.

    The waterways coursing around the city’s boroughs, especially the Hudson River, were just as filthy. In 1965, then-New York Gov. Nelson Rockefeller accurately called the Hudson “one great septic tank.” Indeed, 170 million gallons of raw sewage fouled the river daily while factories along its banks treated it as a waste pit. A General Motors plant in Sleepy Hollow, 27 miles north of New York City, poured its paint sludge directly into the river. Even worse, General Electric manufacturing plants in Fort Edwards and Hudson Falls dumped about 1.3 million pounds of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), a probable human carcinogen, into the river over a 30-year period ending in 1977. Since 1984, a 200 mile stretch of the river from Hudson Falls to Manhattan’s southern tip has been on the EPA’s Superfund program list of the country’s most hazardous waste sites.

    Protections Prevent Disease and Save Lives

    Fast forward to today. By and large, the environmental laws Congress began passing in the 1970s have been remarkably successful.

    Thanks to the Clean Water Act, for example, tens of billions of pounds of sewage, chemicals and trash have been kept out of U.S. waterways since it was enacted 45 years ago. In New York City, harbor water quality has improved so much that humpback whales have returned for the first time in a century.

    Thanks to the Clean Air Act, nationwide emissions of six common pollutants — carbon monoxide, lead, nitrogen dioxide, ozone, particulate matter (soot) and sulfur dioxide — plunged 70 % on average between 1970 and 2015.

    New Yorkers are breathing easier, too. On Earth Day last April, the city’s health department released a report announcing that air pollution in the Big Apple is at the lowest level ever recorded. Between 2008 and 2015, nitrogen dioxide and particulate matter declined 23 percent and 18 percent, respectively, while sulfur dioxide levels plummeted 84 percent after the city and state tightened heating oil rules.

    That’s all good news for public health. In 2010 alone, according to an EPA study, Clean Air Act programs that reduced levels of fine particulate matter and ground-level ozone prevented an estimated 160,000 premature deaths, 130,000 heart attacks, and 1.7 million asthma attacks across the country.

    These accomplishments, however, do not mean it’s time to eliminate or weaken environmental safeguards. There is still much left to do. Consider that in just one year — 2015 — polluters dumped more than 190 million tons of toxic chemicals into waterways nationwide; at least 5,000 community drinking water systems violated federal lead regulations; and some 116 million Americans lived in counties with harmful levels of ozone or particulate matter pollution, which have been linked to lung cancer, asthma, cardiovascular damage, reproductive problems and premature death.

    If You Can’t Kill ’Em, Just Don’t Enforce ’Em

    Fortunately, it will be very difficult for the Trump administration to roll back 50 years’ worth of congressionally mandated rules protecting the public from industrial poisons, harmful drugs, adulterated food and defective products. Trump’s regulation czar conceded the point immediately after the December 14 White House photo op.

    “I think returning to 1960s levels would likely require legislation. It’s hard for me to know what that looks like,” said Neomi Rao, director of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs at the Office of Management and Budget. “Deregulation also takes time. If we’re doing something consistent with the law, it takes time to reduce rules.”

    In the meantime, the Trump administration is resorting to the next best—or worst—thing, depending on your perspective: It has cut back dramatically on enforcing environmental laws.

    A recent New York Times report compared the number of enforcement actions filed in the first nine months of the Trump EPA with what the two previous administrations did over the same time period. Under Scott Pruitt, the EPA initiated about 1,900 cases, about a third fewer than under Lisa Jackson, President Obama’s first EPA administrator, and about a quarter fewer than under Christine Todd Whitman, who directed the agency under President George W. Bush and was not known for aggressive enforcement.

    The Times also found that the Trump EPA is reluctant to seek civil penalties. In its first nine months, the agency tagged polluters for about $50.4 million for violations. Adjusted for inflation, that amounts to roughly 70 percent of what the Bush EPA levied and only about 39 percent of what the Obama EPA sought over the same time frame.

    To make matters worse, Pruitt is threatening to cut off funding for the Justice Department’s Environment and Natural Resources Division, which files lawsuits on behalf of the EPA’s Superfund program to force polluters to cover the cost of cleaning up contaminated sites. In recent years, the EPA has reimbursed the division more than $20 million annually.

    In an apparent attempt to blunt criticism, Trump acknowledged at last week’s photo op that purging a half century of protections could have an adverse impact, and he assured Americans that he would not let that happen.

    Somehow, I’m not convinced. Given the president’s penchant for lying, his administration’s abysmal track record, and now his avowed intention to kill nearly 90 percent of federal regulations, the smoke Trump is blowing is as thick as 1960s New York smog.
    But we have to Protect People from the EVIL WEED !!!
     
    1. imported__2355
    2. shootersa
      Goodness.
      What a copy and paste spew full of ............. spew.
      The regulations Trump is rescinding are aimed at the excess of the Obama administration.
      You know, like the one that literally gave the EPA the right to fine people because of their mud puddles. Remember the guy who had a small pond on his property, the pond he carved out and filled with water from a stream he had water rights for, you know, so his cattle wouldn't die of thirst in the summer? The guy who was fined by the EPA for violation of Obama's new regulation?
      The guy who had to sue the EPA?

      https://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/19/us/regulatory-war-fought-over-a-wyoming-familys-pond.html

      He did eventually win, but then, the question becomes, why did he have to fight his own government in the first place?
      The dope smokers would do well to read about this case.
       
      shootersa, Jan 29, 2018
    3. imported__2355
      Wiat. Your saying that you actually believe a government agency once given power and what it thinks is a mandate won't abuse both. NOW who's smoking what?
       
      imported__2355, Jan 29, 2018
    #76
  14. Rixer

    Rixer Horndog

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2008
    Messages:
    28,938
    Oh Jesus. It's only good for healing purposes so don't enjoy it while you medicate. lol You sound like a fucking Mormon that refuses to let his family drink tea. Unless they're sick then it's okay because it has healing abilities.. At any rate, did you know there are many ways to consume weed without smoking it or are you just using that excuse as a prop for your bigotry?

    As to its potential for abuse, we’re humans. We eat laundry soap for fun. We’ll abuse anything we can get our hands on. However, the consequences of consuming too much weed are far less severe than the consequences of consuming Tide Pods.[​IMG]

    Get a grip
     
    #77